I've been off the radar for a while. There's been a bit of a lull with the Lexi case and only little blips here and there of a few others I've been following. I admit, I feel bad because this case was one I'd been wanting to write about for several months.
Back in March, Allen County Children's Services moved a 21 month old foster child from her foster home and to the home of a relative that already had custody of an older sibling. The child had been removed from her mother at birth and placed with the foster family as purely a fostering situation. Reunification efforts had been made, but due to the mother's inability to cooperate, ACCS moved to the next step and that was relative placement.
This is where it all gets a little weird.
It had come to the attention of those involved that the mother had been working with the foster family in an effort to allow the foster family to adopt the toddler shortly before the child had been moved. They'd been working on a private adoption in Mercer county. The adoption was granted two weeks after the child had been removed from the foster home. Apparently the foster couple, Brian and Kelly Anderson, had misrepresented themselves in order to obtain the adoption. They claimed that the child had been placed in their home as an adoptive placement and even claimed she was in their custody. So adoption granted and the judge demanded the child's immediate return. Allen County dug in their heels and challenged Mercer County's orders based on lack of jurisdiction.
In June of this year, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that Mercer County had overstepped and did not have jurisdiction. I cannot find the OSC document, but here is the article talking about the case:
Court Rules In Favor of Allen County
Brian and Kelly Anderson cried foul on their respective social media accounts (as well as a Bring Maddy Home page). It had even come to public attention that they were in the process of having their foster license revoked due to breaking confidentiality rules and trying to wrangle a shady adoption out from under ACCS's nose.
I assumed this case was done and it was cut and dried. Allen County had legal custody and at that time, had been the only ones with the authority to decide where the child would reside. The mother didn't have custody and had no legal authority to decide where the child went. And yet, she was able to arrange a private adoption with the foster family? Last time I checked on things, you couldn't adopt out a kid you didn't have custody of.
It seemed that the Andersons and mother's war cry were based on the mom "having the right to decide her child's best interest", or something to that effect. Okay, so they think mom should have the right to adopt her kid out while the child is in CPS custody? The Andersons are freakin' foster parents, so they know damned well how the laws work. It's a dependency case. You can't circumvent Children's Services and try to adopt the kid out from behind everyone's back, especially a kid you don't even have legal or physical custody of! It's not rocket science.
Now I know many who are probably thinking "But hey, Dorkzilla, the Andersons had the child until she was 21 months old, that family was all she knew". I get that they'd had the child for a length of time, but as foster parents, this meant that they would never have her permanently. Just like the Pages out of California, they were nothing more than temporary caregivers until permanency could take place. And in the case of this toddler, ACCS had decided that if the child couldn't go back to her mother than the mother's sister would take her, seeing that she already had custody of one of the mother's other children. The mother really had no say over placement preference in this instance. She could certainly make suggestions, but the final say was with Allen County.
Well, it appears that the Andersons had challenged the June ruling and the Ohio Supreme Court issued a new one. A complete 180 from their original June ruling. Now they claim Mercer County did have authority and that since mom had not been TPR'd, she had a right to decide placement for private adoption.
State ex rel. Allen County Children's Services
The aunt was forced immediately to turn the child over to ACCS so they could take her back to the child hoarding Anderson clan.
This ruling turns dependency law on its damned head.
When a child is deemed abused/neglected and made a ward of the state, the county which took the child generally has the jurisdiction. They have the final say in all aspects of that's child's life until the child is then returned to the legal custody of a parent or guardian. The general rule of dependency law is that if reunification with the parent does not work out, family placement is considered the next step. Allowing unrelated foster parents to adopt the child is supposed to be a last resort. The Andersons took the child in as a foster child and were there to help in reunification efforts. Those efforts fell through. So, as planned, the child was sent to live with an aunt who had been approved as placement and already had custody of an older sibling. Nowhere in depedency law can a parent adopt their kid out from foster care without the green light from the county/agency that holds legal custody of the child.
It's sad that so many support the Andersons, even with the lies they told to get the first fraudulent adoption and the smear campaign they ran against the county and judges involved. The mother has all but rubbed this ill gotten victory in her sister's face, clearly showing that she cared nothing for the child her sister already had or the child who was now being forced to live with strangers. Strangers who will slam the door in everyone's face first chance they have. They got their prize. They have no use for any of them now.
The courts need to realize the error in their ruling and send Maddy back home to her aunt and brother. This is where she belongs. Don't allow her drug addicted manipulative mother to run the show and don't let the Andersons bully you into rolling over with this. What does that tell your public? That you cower to drug addicts and entitled adopters who hoard children like various nick knacks? Dependency law has always been clear - family first, especially if said family is already raising siblings. Even the mother's two oldest children have cried foul of this ruling. The whole family is reeling. They want Maddy back home so she can grow up with her siblings and family, not become another accessory to a man and a woman who collect more children than they know what to do with.
Saturday, October 22, 2016
Sunday, July 10, 2016
Courts Rule In CA Foster Child Case
It's been a while, fellow humans. I'll admit, I did take a bit of a break to work on other projects. I needed a break from the more serious stuff going on in the adoption world and wanted to continue working on a novel I'd been working on since late 2013. It's difficult enough working on one or the other when working full time, so attempting to maintain the blog as well as continue work on the novel in between a 40+ hour work week had become more of a chore than I was willing to take on. Something had to be sacrificed, if only briefly.
I come to you all with good news from CA. For those who are familiar with the case of Foster Family Page and the little foster child, Lexi, you know that the former foster family had been fighting an uphill battle to reclaim little Lexi after managing to legally hold her hostage for 3 yrs in an effort to fight reunification and placement efforts with family. When the day came for Lexi to be removed from their home, they'd arranged a massive media circus complete with screaming and wailing people. The idea was to pull at public sympathy, watching as the foster woman and her children screamed in the driveway. Watching as friends of the foster family and neighbors all screamed and carried on as the child was carried to the waiting car. For some, it triggered outrage at social services for snatching that little girl from the "only home she knew" and for others, the outrage was aimed at the family and their supporters. Outrage at how callous they could be in exposing the little girl to such a spectacle.
On their public Facebook page, they make constant claims of how she didn't want to go, didn't know the extended family she was being taken to, was traumatized by her removal from her "true family". The interesting thing is the fact that the court documents they'd provided painted a very different picture. It contradicted their claims. In my first mention of this case, I provided a link to one of the original court opinions. You can find the opinion here: Appellate Opinion 2014.
Lexi was removed from the dysfunctional foster family in March 2016. Moved to the family she knew and knew she would be going to for a long time. Remember, the Pages were well aware that if reunification fell through with her father, she would go to extended family that already had custody of some of her siblings. The family she should have gone to nearly 3 yrs ago had the foster family not dug their talons in and tried to hold her hostage. They'd purposely held onto her as long as they could in the hopes the courts would rule a forced best interest, a common ploy used by wanna be adoptive homes. In this case, because Lexi was a ward of the state, there were state and federal laws in play that have placement preferences in place. Reunification with parents is a first and if that falls through, extended family is the next option. This is common in just about any foster care situation. If children cannot be returned to parents, next of kin is given preference over strangers, even if those strangers were fostering the child for a period of time.
The Pages attempted to appeal the decision and were shot down a few times. They were even rejected by the CA Supreme Court. There was a recent appellate court hearing and the opinion just became available. It's a lengthy read, but worth it. It paints a very very different picture of the foster family.
Appellate Opinion 2016
There were some troubling observations highlighted in section B of the published opinion. Of course, the admin who runs the Save Lexi Facebook page (supporters of the foster parents) and many of their die hard supporters completely ignore the information released regarding how the Pages handled being foster parents.
*refused to allow a second day of visitation with extended family because the social worker was late returning her to their home.
*interfered with her one on one therapy and insisted it happen at their home to allow them to be involved and to monitor her.
*balked at week long visits with extended family, claiming that their own children were not allowed overnight visits at that age.
*frequently claimed child was anxious and difficult after visitations with extended fam and claimed child did not want contact to continue, contrary to what the therapist, social workers and GAL observed
*were hesitant at assisting child in exploring her native roots, refusing to participate in a smudging ceremony, discouraging child from participating and objects made by child found their way to the trash
*their idea of exploring child's native roots was painting a wall Navajo blue.
So there it is. The Page family deemed themselves superior and made every effort they could to interfere with the child being transitioned to her extended family in Utah. They interfered with visitations, attempted to make claims that the extended family caused her anxiety, interfered with her therapy sessions and refused to assist the child in exploring her culture. This is just what is documented in the opinion. And even the professionals involved made it clear that the Pages had failed to perform their duty as foster parents by these actions. Clear efforts were made by Rusty and Summer to isolate Lexi and push themselves onto her as her "only family".
I've heard through sources that the media coverage and opinion documents only chronicle a fraction of the Pages dysfunction in how they handled Lexi. Granted, this is third hand info, so there is no way to validate its accuracy. I've heard through trusted sources that she was actually happy to be taken from their home and tore that tight braid from her hair the moment she stepped foot in Utah. It has been hinted that the Page home had been an unhealthy environment for her. In the comment thread of a recent WND article, there is a commenter stating that cameras were all over the home and the child was videotaped frequently to monitor her. This allegation somewhat mirrors the issue the therapist had with gaining one on one access to Lexi. The Pages balked at individual therapy outside of their home because they wanted to be involved to monitor her and interfered frequently during group sessions. Other allegation by this same commenter are that Lexi was not allowed to play with certain neighborhood children because those children were "going to hell" and that the Pages tried desperately to minimize Lexi's relationship with her siblings in Utah.
The appellate opinion alone highlights the Pages failure to be adequate foster parents once they realized the child would be removed from their home and this information, along with what I've heard through other sources and the commenter in the WND article, paint a very dark and disturbing picture of this family who touted themselves as saviors to this little foster child. I wonder what that child is telling those around her now.
Of course, the Pages and their supporters are wailing and praying and pushing to take this case to the United States Supreme Court. Some are even pointing out that the big win in 2013 (Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl) should be the shoe in they need to get Lexi back into their clutches, even though Adoptive Couple was addressed in early hearings and the courts determined it did not apply to this case. Some have suggested private investigators be hired to stalk and monitor how the child is faring in Utah. A few have outright suggested they just go to Utah and snatch her back.
What took me and others by surprise was the fact that some of their supporters actually took the time to read the documents and started pointing out the misleading misinformation the Pages presented. With the truth published in the most recent appellate opinion, those who took the time to read felt the Pages had lied to them and the child should be left alone. It was good to see some of them waking up and seeing the bullshit for what it was. As for the rest of them still blindly towing the party line....well, you can't fix stupid.
I come to you all with good news from CA. For those who are familiar with the case of Foster Family Page and the little foster child, Lexi, you know that the former foster family had been fighting an uphill battle to reclaim little Lexi after managing to legally hold her hostage for 3 yrs in an effort to fight reunification and placement efforts with family. When the day came for Lexi to be removed from their home, they'd arranged a massive media circus complete with screaming and wailing people. The idea was to pull at public sympathy, watching as the foster woman and her children screamed in the driveway. Watching as friends of the foster family and neighbors all screamed and carried on as the child was carried to the waiting car. For some, it triggered outrage at social services for snatching that little girl from the "only home she knew" and for others, the outrage was aimed at the family and their supporters. Outrage at how callous they could be in exposing the little girl to such a spectacle.
On their public Facebook page, they make constant claims of how she didn't want to go, didn't know the extended family she was being taken to, was traumatized by her removal from her "true family". The interesting thing is the fact that the court documents they'd provided painted a very different picture. It contradicted their claims. In my first mention of this case, I provided a link to one of the original court opinions. You can find the opinion here: Appellate Opinion 2014.
Lexi was removed from the dysfunctional foster family in March 2016. Moved to the family she knew and knew she would be going to for a long time. Remember, the Pages were well aware that if reunification fell through with her father, she would go to extended family that already had custody of some of her siblings. The family she should have gone to nearly 3 yrs ago had the foster family not dug their talons in and tried to hold her hostage. They'd purposely held onto her as long as they could in the hopes the courts would rule a forced best interest, a common ploy used by wanna be adoptive homes. In this case, because Lexi was a ward of the state, there were state and federal laws in play that have placement preferences in place. Reunification with parents is a first and if that falls through, extended family is the next option. This is common in just about any foster care situation. If children cannot be returned to parents, next of kin is given preference over strangers, even if those strangers were fostering the child for a period of time.
The Pages attempted to appeal the decision and were shot down a few times. They were even rejected by the CA Supreme Court. There was a recent appellate court hearing and the opinion just became available. It's a lengthy read, but worth it. It paints a very very different picture of the foster family.
Appellate Opinion 2016
There were some troubling observations highlighted in section B of the published opinion. Of course, the admin who runs the Save Lexi Facebook page (supporters of the foster parents) and many of their die hard supporters completely ignore the information released regarding how the Pages handled being foster parents.
*refused to allow a second day of visitation with extended family because the social worker was late returning her to their home.
*interfered with her one on one therapy and insisted it happen at their home to allow them to be involved and to monitor her.
*balked at week long visits with extended family, claiming that their own children were not allowed overnight visits at that age.
*frequently claimed child was anxious and difficult after visitations with extended fam and claimed child did not want contact to continue, contrary to what the therapist, social workers and GAL observed
*were hesitant at assisting child in exploring her native roots, refusing to participate in a smudging ceremony, discouraging child from participating and objects made by child found their way to the trash
*their idea of exploring child's native roots was painting a wall Navajo blue.
So there it is. The Page family deemed themselves superior and made every effort they could to interfere with the child being transitioned to her extended family in Utah. They interfered with visitations, attempted to make claims that the extended family caused her anxiety, interfered with her therapy sessions and refused to assist the child in exploring her culture. This is just what is documented in the opinion. And even the professionals involved made it clear that the Pages had failed to perform their duty as foster parents by these actions. Clear efforts were made by Rusty and Summer to isolate Lexi and push themselves onto her as her "only family".
I've heard through sources that the media coverage and opinion documents only chronicle a fraction of the Pages dysfunction in how they handled Lexi. Granted, this is third hand info, so there is no way to validate its accuracy. I've heard through trusted sources that she was actually happy to be taken from their home and tore that tight braid from her hair the moment she stepped foot in Utah. It has been hinted that the Page home had been an unhealthy environment for her. In the comment thread of a recent WND article, there is a commenter stating that cameras were all over the home and the child was videotaped frequently to monitor her. This allegation somewhat mirrors the issue the therapist had with gaining one on one access to Lexi. The Pages balked at individual therapy outside of their home because they wanted to be involved to monitor her and interfered frequently during group sessions. Other allegation by this same commenter are that Lexi was not allowed to play with certain neighborhood children because those children were "going to hell" and that the Pages tried desperately to minimize Lexi's relationship with her siblings in Utah.
The appellate opinion alone highlights the Pages failure to be adequate foster parents once they realized the child would be removed from their home and this information, along with what I've heard through other sources and the commenter in the WND article, paint a very dark and disturbing picture of this family who touted themselves as saviors to this little foster child. I wonder what that child is telling those around her now.
Of course, the Pages and their supporters are wailing and praying and pushing to take this case to the United States Supreme Court. Some are even pointing out that the big win in 2013 (Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl) should be the shoe in they need to get Lexi back into their clutches, even though Adoptive Couple was addressed in early hearings and the courts determined it did not apply to this case. Some have suggested private investigators be hired to stalk and monitor how the child is faring in Utah. A few have outright suggested they just go to Utah and snatch her back.
What took me and others by surprise was the fact that some of their supporters actually took the time to read the documents and started pointing out the misleading misinformation the Pages presented. With the truth published in the most recent appellate opinion, those who took the time to read felt the Pages had lied to them and the child should be left alone. It was good to see some of them waking up and seeing the bullshit for what it was. As for the rest of them still blindly towing the party line....well, you can't fix stupid.
Sunday, March 20, 2016
The Save Lexi Campaign ***UPDATED***
Hello again, kiddie winkles. I know it's been a while and I do apologize. I've been rather busy with a writing project, some vacation planning, an upcoming Comicon and well, adulting in general.
Today I bring to you a case that once again oozes of pure entitlement. Rusty and Summer Page took in a little girl as a foster placement several years ago. She'd become a dependent of the state as a toddler and had been shuffled between a few homes before landing in the Page's home. They originally took her in as respite care, but that eventually turned into full fostering of the girl.
But there was a catch.
Lexi is recognized as Choctaw. And from the moment the Pages took her in, they were well aware that ICWA was dictating the child's case. The tribe permitted the Pages to continue fostering her so it would keep her closer to her father during the reunification planning. But one thing was certain, placement preference would prevail if and when adoption was put on the table. The Pages knew this and had originally agreed to this.
When reunification efforts failed, it was made clear the child would be transitioned to out of state family. That is when the Pages dug their heels in and tried to fight her removal. Sound familiar, no? Time and time again, we hear about entitled fosters and PAPs who cling to the children they take in and try to cry "only home they know". Of course, that is what the Pages are doing. A couple of years, few court hears and an appeals decison later, the child is being removed within the next 24 to 48 hours and they've managed to wrangle a circle of supporters crying foul over what they all say is an unjust law.
For those curious about the background, here is the appeals decision:
Court of Appeals
Of course, if you go to their Facebook page (they all have FB pages, don't they?), they make it sound like the child's native status is a shock, how she's only X% and shouldn't be considered native enough for ICWA to apply and boo hoo, her removal is oh so sudden.
Last time blood quantum came into question, it was when those bastard Justices in the US Supreme Court questioned Veronica Brown's native eligibility. Same shit, different case. Supporters of Veronica's kidnappers held onto her low blood quantum with an iron grip. Nearly every supporter and every media outlet who regurgitated the BS the public relations firm spoon fed them focused on how little native blood Veronica had. And now supporters of the Pages are doing the same.
Funny how a bunch of ignorant non native people clamor on about who should and shouldn't be considered native. Especially when it's a child they want to snatch for their own. They seem to forget that if the tribe considers the child eligible, then that's just how it is, regardless of how much or how little native blood runs through that child's veins. WE don't get to determine that decision. The US Supreme court doesn't get to determine that decision (they haggled over it, but ruled primarily on the Existing Indian Family doctrine). The decision to determine eligibility exists with the tribe alone.
The one thing I caught on to with the Save Lexi campaign were the familiar faces of some of their supporters. A great deal of their supporters supported the kidnapping of Veronica Brown and supported the Hodgins in stealing back Sonya McCaul. Even the Facebook page holds a striking resemblance to the Save Veronica campaign and Keep Sonya Home campaign. And the infamous Lori Alvino-McGill - who is well know for calling Veronica and her sister "illegitimate spawn" and who represented Veronica's seller in a lawsuit to dismantle ICWA - is on board with this case, spewing her usual lies. Kid you not. She posted an update on the family's Facebook support page, claiming that the family Lexi will be going to doesn't even know the child.
Everyone supporting the Page family keeps rattling on about how it's the only home she's ever known, it will be traumatic, it's not in her best interest. They said the same about the Hodgins and Sonya (the Hodgins literally stole the child and tied it up in court for 8 yrs). Funny how 2 1/2 yrs ago they were saying tearing Veronica Brown away from her dad to live a life as a hostage wouldn't hurt her at all. Tearing a 4 yr old little girl away from the only family she knew and being forced to live with people she didn't remember and only met once during a brief supervised visit. It's perfectly fine when wanna be adopters do it, but if it's the other way around, then it's the end of the world for the child and so horrible.
They just need to admit that they're thinking about their own best interest. Not the child's. The child isn't being torn away to live with strangers. She's had frequent contact with the family she is going to and had it for quite some time. Everyone involved knew the child would go to out of state family if reunification efforts with her father failed. It's not a surprise. This isn't some sudden change in placement that hit them broadside. The Pages have known for years that the child would not be theirs to adopt. They're the ones to blame for dragging this out longer than necessary. They're the ones who tied it up in court for nearly three years in the hopes they'd get a best interest ruling. They're the ones who have now turned what should be a simple and quiet transfer of placement into a big goddamned circus. People are actually suggesting they help bar social workers from removing the girl by force. They support making this child's transition as traumatic as humanly possible. How is that in the child's best interest?
3/22/2016 ***UPDATE***
On 3/21/2016, around 3:00PM PST, LA County Children's Services arrived to pick Lexi up from the Page home. Surrounded by screaming protesters, news crews and the infamous Troy Dunn, who is best known for stalking Veronica Brown at her school, Lexi was moved through a sea of cameras and screams. People rushed the car with cameras and phones, yelling at her through the glass. Summer Page and the Page children stood in the driveway in hysterics over handing the child over.
It was a horrific thing to watch. And this is what the Page family and their supporters wanted the world to see. They could have arranged a secluded and private transfer somewhere away from the circus, but no, it couldn't happen any other way.
Today I bring to you a case that once again oozes of pure entitlement. Rusty and Summer Page took in a little girl as a foster placement several years ago. She'd become a dependent of the state as a toddler and had been shuffled between a few homes before landing in the Page's home. They originally took her in as respite care, but that eventually turned into full fostering of the girl.
But there was a catch.
Lexi is recognized as Choctaw. And from the moment the Pages took her in, they were well aware that ICWA was dictating the child's case. The tribe permitted the Pages to continue fostering her so it would keep her closer to her father during the reunification planning. But one thing was certain, placement preference would prevail if and when adoption was put on the table. The Pages knew this and had originally agreed to this.
When reunification efforts failed, it was made clear the child would be transitioned to out of state family. That is when the Pages dug their heels in and tried to fight her removal. Sound familiar, no? Time and time again, we hear about entitled fosters and PAPs who cling to the children they take in and try to cry "only home they know". Of course, that is what the Pages are doing. A couple of years, few court hears and an appeals decison later, the child is being removed within the next 24 to 48 hours and they've managed to wrangle a circle of supporters crying foul over what they all say is an unjust law.
For those curious about the background, here is the appeals decision:
Court of Appeals
Of course, if you go to their Facebook page (they all have FB pages, don't they?), they make it sound like the child's native status is a shock, how she's only X% and shouldn't be considered native enough for ICWA to apply and boo hoo, her removal is oh so sudden.
Last time blood quantum came into question, it was when those bastard Justices in the US Supreme Court questioned Veronica Brown's native eligibility. Same shit, different case. Supporters of Veronica's kidnappers held onto her low blood quantum with an iron grip. Nearly every supporter and every media outlet who regurgitated the BS the public relations firm spoon fed them focused on how little native blood Veronica had. And now supporters of the Pages are doing the same.
Funny how a bunch of ignorant non native people clamor on about who should and shouldn't be considered native. Especially when it's a child they want to snatch for their own. They seem to forget that if the tribe considers the child eligible, then that's just how it is, regardless of how much or how little native blood runs through that child's veins. WE don't get to determine that decision. The US Supreme court doesn't get to determine that decision (they haggled over it, but ruled primarily on the Existing Indian Family doctrine). The decision to determine eligibility exists with the tribe alone.
The one thing I caught on to with the Save Lexi campaign were the familiar faces of some of their supporters. A great deal of their supporters supported the kidnapping of Veronica Brown and supported the Hodgins in stealing back Sonya McCaul. Even the Facebook page holds a striking resemblance to the Save Veronica campaign and Keep Sonya Home campaign. And the infamous Lori Alvino-McGill - who is well know for calling Veronica and her sister "illegitimate spawn" and who represented Veronica's seller in a lawsuit to dismantle ICWA - is on board with this case, spewing her usual lies. Kid you not. She posted an update on the family's Facebook support page, claiming that the family Lexi will be going to doesn't even know the child.
Everyone supporting the Page family keeps rattling on about how it's the only home she's ever known, it will be traumatic, it's not in her best interest. They said the same about the Hodgins and Sonya (the Hodgins literally stole the child and tied it up in court for 8 yrs). Funny how 2 1/2 yrs ago they were saying tearing Veronica Brown away from her dad to live a life as a hostage wouldn't hurt her at all. Tearing a 4 yr old little girl away from the only family she knew and being forced to live with people she didn't remember and only met once during a brief supervised visit. It's perfectly fine when wanna be adopters do it, but if it's the other way around, then it's the end of the world for the child and so horrible.
They just need to admit that they're thinking about their own best interest. Not the child's. The child isn't being torn away to live with strangers. She's had frequent contact with the family she is going to and had it for quite some time. Everyone involved knew the child would go to out of state family if reunification efforts with her father failed. It's not a surprise. This isn't some sudden change in placement that hit them broadside. The Pages have known for years that the child would not be theirs to adopt. They're the ones to blame for dragging this out longer than necessary. They're the ones who tied it up in court for nearly three years in the hopes they'd get a best interest ruling. They're the ones who have now turned what should be a simple and quiet transfer of placement into a big goddamned circus. People are actually suggesting they help bar social workers from removing the girl by force. They support making this child's transition as traumatic as humanly possible. How is that in the child's best interest?
3/22/2016 ***UPDATE***
On 3/21/2016, around 3:00PM PST, LA County Children's Services arrived to pick Lexi up from the Page home. Surrounded by screaming protesters, news crews and the infamous Troy Dunn, who is best known for stalking Veronica Brown at her school, Lexi was moved through a sea of cameras and screams. People rushed the car with cameras and phones, yelling at her through the glass. Summer Page and the Page children stood in the driveway in hysterics over handing the child over.
It was a horrific thing to watch. And this is what the Page family and their supporters wanted the world to see. They could have arranged a secluded and private transfer somewhere away from the circus, but no, it couldn't happen any other way.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)